AESTHETIC RESISTANCE ANALYSIS IN THE KERATON YOGYAKARTA BUILDING COLUMN

Authors

  • Darini Yusrina Abidah Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Faiz Ramadiansyah Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Sovie Nurmalia Junita Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Dian Kartika Santoso Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33005/border.v6i2.774

Keywords:

aesthetic, architecture element, Keraton, resistance

Abstract

Two fundamental requirements for sustainable rural area development are enhancing the well-being of the rural populace and safeguarding cultural assets. The preservation of architectural buildings' aesthetic value is one aspect of cultural preservation, but frequently, welfare improvements do not align with these efforts. It is necessary to draw aesthetic guidelines from construction projects with notable cultural significance. The buildings of Keraton Yogyakarta is a national landmark which has unique aesthetic qualities. The study in question focuses on the building's column in Keraton Yogyakarta and its ability to withstand aesthetic criticism. There are two goals to this architectural research on aesthetic resilience. 1) To determine the aesthetic columns' resilience value in Keraton Yogyakarta buildings; 2) To differentiate architectural parts according to their resilience value. The constructivism research paradigm served as the foundation for the conduct of this research. A combination of qualitative and historical research methods is the research strategy being used in this research. Historical research is used to gather historical data. Qualitative study focuses on the formal nature of an aesthetic to determine its aesthetic resilience value. According to the findings, there are three levels of aesthetic resilience in the decorative components implemented on the columns. 1) the most significant aesthetic resilience is seen in the Javanese ornaments that are still in place; 2) the color of the columns varies over time but still exhibits aesthetic resilience; and 3) there is no aesthetic resilience found in the European features.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidah, D.Y. (2019) Kajian Resistensi Estetika Elemen Arsitektur Pada Tampang Bangunan Di Kompleks Keraton Yogyakarta. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

Adianti, I. And Nurina, V.A. (2019) ‘Pola Desain Fasad Pada Deret Bangunan Baluwarti Kraton Yogyakarta Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kenyamanan Termal’, Border Jurnal Arsitektur, 1(1). Available At: Https://Kratonjogja.Id/Tata-Rakiting-Wewangunan/5/Benteng-Keraton-.

Dakung, S. (1987) Arsitektur Tradisional Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.

Dowling Christopher (2010) Aesthetic Formalism, Internet Encyclopedia Of Philosophy. Available At: Https://Iep.Utm.Edu/Aesthetic-Formalism/ (Accessed: 1 April 2023).

Gie Lang (1983) Garis Besar Arsitektur. Yogyakarta: Supersukses.

Groat, L. And Wang, D. (2013) Architectural Research Methods.

Kartono L (1999) ‘Ruang Manusia Dan Rumah Tinggal : Suatu Tinjauan’, Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur, 27(2).

Kevin, D. (2014) Architecture And Rural Planning : Claiming The Vernacular. Newcastle: Newcastle University Eprints.

Krt Nendyaoraharjo (2018) ‘Tapas Pariwisata Keraton Yogyakarta’, Keraton Yogyakarta [Preprint].

Lang John (1989) Creating Architectural Theory. New York: Von Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Mothersill, M. (1985) Beauty Restored. Oxfordshire: Clarendon Press.

Muslimin, I. (2015) Resistensi Paguyuban Pedagang Pasar Tradisional Terhadap Pembangunan Mall Dinoyo City (Study Di Paguyuban Pedagang Pasar Dinoyo Malang). Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Oxford (1991) Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press.

Patella, G. (2013) Contemporary Aesthetic. Available At: Https://Contempaesthetics.Org/Newvolume/Pages/Article.Php?Articleid=658 (Accessed: 9 June 2024).

Safeyah, M. (2000) ‘Perkembangan “Arsitektur Kolonial” Di Kawasan Potroagung’, Jurnal Rekayasa Perencanaan, 3(1).

Saryono (2010) Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Bidang Kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Scruton, R. (1979) The Aesthetic Of Architecture. London: Metheum & Co.Ltd.

Soeratman, D. (1989) Kehidupan Dunia Kraton Surakarta 1830 - 1939. Seri Pustaka Keraton Nusantara. Taman Siswa.

Wardani, L.K. Et Al. (2011) ‘Gaya Seni Hindu-Jawa Pada Tata Ruang Keraton Yogyakarta’, Dimensi Interior, 9(2), Pp. 108–118.

Wiranto (1999) ‘Arsitektur Vernakular Indonesia : Perannya Dalam Pengembangan Jati Diri’, Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur, 27(2).

Zangwill, N. (2001) The Metaphysics Of Beauty. New York: Cornell University Press.

Žižek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object Of Ideology. New York: Verso.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-14

How to Cite

Darini Yusrina Abidah, Faiz Ramadiansyah, Sovie Nurmalia Junita, & Dian Kartika Santoso. (2024). AESTHETIC RESISTANCE ANALYSIS IN THE KERATON YOGYAKARTA BUILDING COLUMN . Border: Jurnal Arsitektur, 6(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.33005/border.v6i2.774