STUDY OF PREFERENCES FOR STUDENT COMMUNAL SPACE IN THE UPN VETERAN JAWA TIMUR

Authors

  • Azkia Avenzoar UPN "Veteran" Jatim
  • Dominikus Aditya Fitriyanto
  • Yerry Kahaditu Firmansyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33005/border.v6i1.766

Keywords:

communal space, preference, room atmosphere, room facilities

Abstract

The communal space for students in the university is important to support academic activities, considering that student activities on campus are not only in classrooms, studios, laboratories, and libraries. However, these shared areas are often poorly designed, leading to disruptions and discomfort for users. This research aims to gather preferences for student communal spaces at UPN "Veteran" Jawa Timur. The research objectives include identifying perceptions of the availability of student communal spaces and the activities carried out in these spaces. Furthermore, it aims to identify expectations for the atmosphere and facilities in these communal spaces. The results of the analysis of these expectations for the atmosphere and facilities are then linked to the types of activities. This research is conducted using a qualitative method. Data is collected through online questionnaires distributed to UPN "Veteran" Jawa Timur students and then analyzed using content analysis with stages including open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The results show that psychological atmosphere factors, as well as thermal, auditory, and visual comfort, are dominant in the desired atmosphere by respondents. Additionally, the expected facilities are electronic and electrical.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allameh, E. And Heidari, M. (2020) ‘Sustainable Street Furniture’, Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 51(1), Pp. 65–74. available at: https://doi.org/10.3311/ppar.12674.

Chernov, Y. And Kuprienko, K. (2020) ‘Tetris-Xo’, 26 February. Available At: https://www.behance.net/gallery/92833057/tetris-xo (accessed: 20 june 2024).

Creswell, J.W. And Tashakkori, A. (2007) ‘Editorial: Differing Perspectives On Mixed Methods Research’, Journal Of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), Pp. 303–308. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807306132.

Darmiwati, R. (2000) ‘Studi Ruang Bersama Dalam Rumah Susun Bagi Penghuni Berpenghasilan Rendah’, 28(2).

Fajarwati, A.N., Khusniah, R. And Arystianto, D.P. (2023) ‘Evaluasi Dan Redesain Ruang Komunal Mahasiswa Dengan Metode Poe Di Gedung Perkuliahan Jts, Polinema’, Tekstur, 4(2), Pp. 15–163.

Firmandhani, S.W., Setioko, B. And Setyowati, E. (2013) ‘Faktor Pembentuk Persepsi Ruang Komunal Di Pemukiman Nelayan (Studi Kasus: Pemukiman Nelayan Tambak Mulyo Semarang)’, Teknik, 34(2), P. 95. available at: https://doi.org/10.14710/teknik.v34i2.5633.

Fitriyanto, D.A., Mutia, F. And Krisnawatie, A. (2023) ‘Urban Acupuncture : Investigasi Pola Perilaku Terhadap Street Furniture Di Ruang Publik Kampus’, Jurnal Arsitektur Arcade, 7(1), P. 56. available at: https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v7i1.1239.

Hami, A. And Abdi, B. (2021) ‘Students’ Landscaping Preferences For Open Spaces For Their Campus Environment’, Indoor And Built Environment, 30(1), Pp. 87–98. available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326x19887207.

He, F. (2021) ‘The Planning And Design Of Outdoor Furniture Based On The Characteristics Of School Culture’, Tobacco Regulatory Science, 7(5), Pp. 1889–1894. available at: https://doi.org/10.18001/trs.7.5.110.

Humphry, J. Et Al. (2022) ‘The Design And Public Imaginaries Of Smart Street Furniture’, In S. Flynn (Ed.) Equality In The City: Imaginaries Of The Smart Future. Intellect Books, Pp. 127–148. available at: https://doi.org/10.1386/9781789384642_6.

Lina, H.M. (2021) ‘Kenyamanan Ruang Kuliah Di Kampus ITB: Sebuah Persepsi Mahasiswa’, Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 10(4), Pp. 199–206. available at: https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v10i4.16.

Marnisari, J.A. (2021) ‘Pengaruh Sarana Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Prodi Arsitektur Upn “Veteran” Jawa Timur’, Border, 3(1), Pp. 63–70. available at: https://doi.org/10.33005/border.v3i1.87.

Pezeshkpoor, Z. (2020) ‘The Role Of Movability On Campus Outdoor Furniture’. Kansas State University.

Schotanus, R. (2020) ‘Nationale-Nederlanden Group Offices – The Hague’, https://officesnapshots.com, 16 april. available at: https://officesnapshots.com/2020/04/16/nationale-nederlanden-group-offices-the-hague/ (accessed: 20 june 2024).

Shukla, D, D., R.G. (2021) ‘Need For Conscious Planning: Residual Spaces–A Consequence Of The Current Planning Process’, Conscious Urbanism, 1(1), Pp. 23–29.

Siagian, M., Sitorus, R. And Eddy, F. (2018) ‘The Preferences Of Outdoor Communal Spaces On Campus Ofuniversity Of Sumatera Utara’:, In Proceedings Of The International Conference Of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental And Ramification Researches. International Conference Of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental And Ramification Researches, Medan, Indonesia: Scitepress - Science and Technology Publications, Pp. 287–290. available At: Https://doi.Org/10.5220/0010086602870290.

Stirena Rossy Tamariska Et Al. (2019) ‘Peran Ruang Komunal Dalam Menciptakan Sense Of Community Studi Komparasi Perumahan Terencana Dan Perumahan Tidak Terencana’, Jurnal Koridor, 10(1), Pp. 65–73. Available At: https://doi.Org/10.32734/koridor.v10i1.1388.

Susanti, A. And Natalia, T.W. (2018) ‘Public Space Strategic Planning Based On Z Generation Preferences’, Iop Conference Series: Materials Science And Engineering, 407, P. 012076. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/407/1/012076.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Azkia Avenzoar, Dominikus Aditya Fitriyanto, & Yerry Kahaditu Firmansyah. (2024). STUDY OF PREFERENCES FOR STUDENT COMMUNAL SPACE IN THE UPN VETERAN JAWA TIMUR. Border: Jurnal Arsitektur, 6(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.33005/border.v6i1.766

Issue

Section

Articles