MODEL PRAGMATISME EKSPERIMENTAL DALAM ARSITEKTUR

  • Kurnia Widiastuti Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Ikaputra Ikaputra Universitas Gadjah Mada
Keywords: architecture, experimental pragmatism, model

Abstract

The discourse on experimental pragmatism, as a paradigm in architecture and in other fields, is still very limited. Most references still place this term as jargon. This study aims to establish definition and working model of experimental pragmatism paradigm in architecture using content analysis methods. It was learned that experimental pragmatism can be defined as a design paradigm that prioritizes the strength of goals (discoveries) and their actualization in the process (experimentation) and design outcomes according to their attributes (method-and-parameter (process) and nature-and-parameters (output)). The definition of experimental pragmatism (PE) includes three aspects, namely the aspect of the goal (T) to get a new discovery (discovery), the process aspect (P), and the output aspect (L). This definition can be translated as a working model into formula PE = T x (PMP + LSP), where MP is Method and Parameter and SP is Characteristic and Parameter.

References

Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. (2009) “PARADIGMA ILMU SOSIAL-BUDAYA,” in Kuliah Umum “Paradigma Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora.” Bandung: Program Studi Linguistik Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Brooks, B. W., Fulton, B. A. dan Hanson, M. L. (2015) “Aquatic toxicology studies with macrophytes and algae should balance experimental pragmatism with environmental realism (editorial),” Science of the Total Environment. Elsevier B.V., 536, hal. 406–407. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.085.

Cook, P. (1970) Experimental Architecture. New York: Universe Book.

Desautels-Stein, J. (2012) “Experimental Pragmatism in the Third Globalization,” Contemporary Pragmatism, 9(2), hal. 181–204.

Ihalauw, J. J. O. I. (2008) Konstruksi Teori: Komponen dan Proses. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Ikatan Arsitek Indonesia (2007) Pedoman Hubungan Kerja antara Arsitek dengan Pengguna Jasa. 1 ed. Jakarta: Badan Sistem Informasi Arsitektur Ikatan Arsitek Indonesia.

Ikatan Arsitek Indonesia (tanpa tanggal) Alasan Menggunakan Jasa Arsitek, iai.or.id. Tersedia pada: http://www.iai.or.id/tentang-arsitek/jasa-arsitek diakes 21 Juni 2020 15.31 WIB.

Oxford University Press (2019) “experiment,” Lexico.com. Tersedia pada: https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/experiment diakses pada 5 Agustus 2019 08.35.

Porter, D. (2009) “Mecanoo—experimental Pragmatism by Pietro Valle,” Journal of Urban Design, 14(4), hal. 570–571. doi: 10.1080/13574800903265447.

Preiser, W. F. E. (ed.) (1985) Programming the Built Environment. United States of America: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Reif, B. (1973) Models in Urban and Regional Planning. London: Leonard Hill Books.

Tutuko, P. (2015) “PROSES BERPIKIR DALAM MENGKOMUNIKASIKAN PERENCANAAN DAN PEMROGRAMAN ARSITEKTUR,” Jurnal Rekayasa Perencanaan, 1 (2)(February 2005). Tersedia pada: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275655949_PROSES_BERPIKIR_DALAM_MENGKOMUNIKASIKAN_PERENCANAAN_DAN_PEMROGRAMAN_ARSITEKTUR.

Valle, P. (2007) Mecanoo Experimental Pragmatism. Milan: Skira editore.

Published
2020-06-30
Section
Articles